Many people from all around the state of Kansas have volunteered their valuable time and resources for this cause. We are volunteers, there are no salaries or commissions, only the shared goal to protect the rights of Kansan's families and their community.
With our ongoing efforts to partner with the community and grass root organizations, we continue to grow and make a difference. Through working directly with our communities to engage resources and partnerships that will benefit families and their children, and encouraging our elected officials to strive for justice and protection for not just Kansas families, but all citizens, our volunteers remain committed to bringing lasting, positive, and true effective change.
Through this opportunity we hope to inform and educate you about multiple issues effecting you and your family. Our primary goal is to root out the Judiciary and the corruption that is Kansas courtrooms.
The Judiciary is the third arm of government empowered by the constitution and the laws of the United States and each State individually and vested with the Judicial (legal) power of this country. It has the sole responsibility of interpreting the Constitution, laws and administering justice. This Judicial branch is a "Public" service institution and is the branch that is responsible for the day to day administration of the Courts and Tribunals of this land. It was intended to be the "WEAKEST" branch of our government.
In its complete failure to provide this
mandate, the Judiciary has failed miserably to uphold the independence of the
Judiciary, to show a commitment to the true and proper interpretation of the
Constitution and the laws of our country. It has failed to ensure the speedy and
unfettered administration of Justice brought to the door step of our citizens and
has implemented a fear or favor standard in its delivery of justice.
Dr. Les
Sachs, a writer, journalist, and published expert on American corruption now
living abroad, wrote in his article “Portrait of America’s Legal System”: “The
reality is that the United States of America, which proclaims itself the ‘land
of freedom,’ has the most dishonest, dangerous and crooked legal system of any
developed nation. Legal corruption is covering America like a blanket.” He
recognizes the real problem here, which is that judges are and have been making
arbitrary decisions without any consequences for some time, and have been able
to immunize themselves against the people.
Judicial
accountability is a single-issue to end the rampant and pervasive judicial
corruption in the legal system of the United States. We have to expose judicial
immunity in order to deal with it and realize the effect and danger of its
continued existence in our society. We need to recognize that this can only be
achieved by making the judicial branch of government answerable and accountable
to an entity other than itself. It is the result of the judiciary’s arbitrary
abuse to follow the doctrine of law that leaves the people without recourse
when their inherent rights are violated. Judges are not free, in a
constitutional context to twist words to mean what they want them to mean. It
is one thing for a judge to convict on a mistake of fact or law while
protecting the rights of due process, counsel and the jury. It’s a completely
opposite ordeal to convict in absentia without notice or hearing in a “private
trial”, or in chambers without a reporter.
The
average American does not realize that most of these criminals are in powerful
positions and have created a wall of immunity for those who are in power. “A
way to deceive is a way to achieve.” We are mad at our government, we are upset
at the people who have let it happen, and the people that have given them the
immunity to hide behind in their crimes. This system of fraud or claiming to be
for the people, while working against the laws and civil rights of the people.
The political corruption goes right along side with it. The system is all about
money, power, and control. These entities stay up late at night figuring out
how to work it against us. They create the immunity to hide behind their crimes
and we are left without any measurable or true checks and balances within our
system that actually work. When they are given this kind of power, to abuse,
without any remedy for this type of corruption, it will become corrupt. We have
Politicians in trouble for scandals everyday in the news. The American people
have to ask, why are these people not being prosecuted? ANSWER: These people
have immunity; we have to stop this in its tracks now. This will be as ugly a
fight as you could ever dream of since they have the perceived power and we want
to take it away, but this is the only way to constitute proper checks and
balances, and our system was NEVER designed to be run like this.
“Absolute
judicial immunity” protects not only “judicial acts’ with subject matter of
jurisdiction but the conspiracy and conspirators that surround those acts.
I want you to read that sentence again until it sinks in to the true reality of
where and what this does. Given that immunity means, the implication or being
that you can’t sue, you have no mechanism in place for discovery for the truth
in determinations. Few people will ever know the true effect of judicial
corruption unless their ability to sue is denied or their Appeals are
discharged for bogus reasons such as the judges stated rulings rather than the law.
When
you try to determine rights violations in a case or the conspiracy, you have to
look at the “judicial orders” first to see the judicial arrogance these people
have. What you don’t see is the irregularities that go on behind the scene, but
this is what accounts for the “motive” that is necessary to explain why or how
the order was issued. What does “jurisdiction” mean in text? In the sense that
immunity attaches itself to the judges it means
“the personal rights of the judge to do as they please”. They can
violate Due Process, the Constitution, civil rights or anything else that is
contradictory to their belief or the outcome they favor or desire. We are at
that point right now!
Underlying
all civil relations between government and the governed is the right to the
governed to compel the government’s obedience to law through the process of
law. If that is not so, we can end this discussion now. The judges will say
that your only right to “redress” are really gifts of your government, and we
will not accept your substitution of “gifts” for rights, and then the civil war
will be threatened. Of course you will not accept their threat of war as a
substitute for the real thing, and the war will come about even though neither
side wants it. Those are the battle lines for civil war! As long as the
judiciary conspires to maintain a policy to deprive people of life, liberty, or
property without Due Process of Law, then we really have no disputes as to
whether it violates our 5th and 14th Amendments or the Constitution.
How
much worse of a betrayal of the human spirit is there than your rights being
lost at the whim of the judicial branch of your own government to whom you turn
to for protection of those rights? This is not a dispute. There is not a judge
or lawyer in the circus that does not know that judicial immunity exists, and
without question violates the Constitution. Our ancestors rebelled against our
constitution but that doesn’t mean it has to stand or be left in place. We
simply have to get back to judicial constitutionality. The Supreme Court has
declared, “Certainly the right to petition extends to all departments of the
Government. The right of access to the courts is but one aspect of the right of
petition. California Transport v. Trucking Unlimited, 404 US 508, 510 (1972).
The right of petition is just as important to the right of free speech and the
other rights contained in the 1st Amendment. The U.S. Supreme court has held,
the right to petition for redress of grievances is among the most precious of
the liberties safeguarded in the Bill of Rights. Thomas v. Collins, 323 US 516;
65 S. Ct 315,322
We have
to impose limits on judicial concepts for immunity. Judicial immunity prevents
democratic change, because moral and legal concepts are not born in true form.
Ideas in law or ethics are like ideas in science: only a few are really basic
and the rest give way to competing ideas that make more sense in our changing
world that measures their worth. Judicial immunity undermines judicial
credibility resulting in the justifications that once were irrefutable but are
now obviously false or irrational. Lastly judicial immunity violates two
American revolutions. The first revolution of 1776, which freed the nation from
the British Rule, which made England have no legal force in America. The next
revolution occurred 14 years later after we set up our own laws and
institutions.
The
problem is unaccountability to those it injures is in violation of the
Constitution. The solution is accountability to those it injures in violation
of the Constitutional rights. Immunity blocks the policing of our government by
the people. Each case of judicial immunity presents to each judge a moral
decision: “Shall I obey my oath and support of the Constitution? Or, shall I
ignore my oath in support of the secular concerns or interest that my
colleagues or friends prefer?
The
constitution either sets the limits of “Jurisdiction” or it does not. If it
does, then a judge has no jurisdiction to do what it forbids, nor can it allow
or command others to do the same. They can not change the legal reality by
redefining words or the “subject matter’ or what the supreme laws of the land
commands them to do. If it does not set limits then where does the authority
come to the “courts of limited jurisdiction”? The constitutional authority to
violate the constitution is in contradiction clearly in terms of denying its
own legal supremacy. Unless we believe the framers were fools, we ought not
think this but look for the cause or causes instead.
The
policy or principles of judicial immunity is completely wrong and the judiciary
created it because they are operating themselves with no oversight by an
outside entity or the other branches. No one may benefit from his or her own
wrong or wrongs. Let juries decide the constitutional credibility of the
defense. The Constitution is no more theirs than it is yours. The problem is
the Constitution was set up for you and your freedoms and rights and they have
to be protected, even if the judiciary branch doesn’t want that. In either
case, the government and the governed shall give each their due recognition and
we will have bridged a democracy that will have a judiciary under the
constitution that embraces the interpretation of the governed, no less than those
chosen to govern. The jury is the Great Equalizer of disputes between the two;
so let’s let it work!
No comments:
Post a Comment